21st Century Governance
Contact Us
  • Home
  • The Governance Corner
  • Learning to Learn Differently
  • Support for Schools

The Governance Corner

A forum for discussing issues in Independent School governance in the second decade of the 21st Century

Read all Posts

Board Member Wanted. No expertise required!

4/19/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
The title of this blog post runs counter to the prevailing view of many Boards and schools. When nomination "slates" are being constructed for the recruitment of new Board members, schools often identify the skill set that they are looking for to fill a perceived gap in expertise (finance, legal, marketing, technology, etc.) on the current Board. Schools that are very particular about whom they hire for administrative positions are often quite cavalier about appointing an "expert" to the Board simply because they come with professional credentials and are an alumnus or the parent of a current student. The desire for free advice outweighs the normal screening process and the administration of the school is often saddled with the results of "getting what they paid for". That is not to say that expertise on a Board is a bad thing, it can be especially valuable for financial oversight, but it is no replacement for professional - and therefore accountable - advice from an employee or paid consultant.
If a Board is strategic, and policy driven, then it can usually avoid the pitfalls of second-guessing the professional staff and the risk of micro-management. So, if you recognize that you don't need to replicated the skills of the administrative team on the Board - what characteristics should you be looking for?
Here is the generally accepted Board member "six pack"! The effective Board member:


1. Keeps things in context: understands the school's mission, traditions, and history and approaches issues in a fashion that is consistent with institutional values;
2. Is a learner: believes in the need to learn, does her/his homework, is self-reflective and seeks feedback on her/his performance as a board member;
3. Is a team player:  believes in Board holism, is collaborative and works for consensus and the attainment of group goals;
4. Is a thinker: recognizes the complexities of issues, tolerates ambiguities, sees the Board as just one constituency among many; and sees the "big picture", understanding how different issues, actions and decisions inter-relate with one another;
5. Is a politician: respects and guards the integrity of the governance process, avoids win/lose situations and works to build healthy relationships; and,
6. Is a strategist: helps the board to stay focused on those priority issues or decisions that can be seen to have strategic or symbolic importance to the school.


There is one other self-perpetuating myth that Board members hold dear. Often, they see themselves as the "business-savvy" advisors to the wooly academics who run schools. For the most part, this is the height of self-delusion. I have worked with and for dozens of Boards. Typically, they are accountants, lawyers, human resources experts, marketers, etc. In other words, most are either independent professionals or middle-management executives. It is the rare board that includes even one CEO that is running a business that is as complex as a school. Years ago, when I was doing some strategic planning with a Board in Quebec, the chair asserted - with agreement around the table - that they were the experts when it came to running the school like a business. Knowing their backgrounds, I gently (okay, maybe not so gently!) pointed out that there were only two people in the room who had any experience in running multi-million dollar corporations with dozens of employees and thousands of clients - the current Head of school and myself. As for the directors around the table, for the most part they had one or two direct reports and operated within organizations of varying sizes in which they had little or no participation in the leadership or management of business operations.
As long as Board members keep reminding themselves that their role is oversight, not management, then they can effectively exercise their governance roles and leave administrative decisions and implementation to the professional staff of the school. After all, that's why they're paid the big bucks!
 

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Dr. Jim Christopher
    has been working with Boards and Heads on Governance issues for the past 15 years. He is a former Superintendent of Schools, ED of the Canadian Association of Independent Schools and Canadian Educational Standards Institute and is the author of a number of books and articles of education and governance. His latest book, Beyond the Manual: A Realist's Guide to Independent School Governance is available on iTunes or at https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/388729

    View my profile on LinkedIn
    21stC Podcast

    Archives

    March 2022
    April 2020
    July 2019
    March 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    April 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly