21st Century Governance
Contact Us
  • Home
  • The Governance Corner
  • Learning to Learn Differently
  • Support for Schools

The Governance Corner

A forum for discussing issues in Independent School governance in the second decade of the 21st Century

Read all Posts

Governance and Accountability: Part 1

4/8/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
Last post I related a couple of instances where the school or system suffered a lack of confidence among its stakeholders due to a failure of oversight on the part of the Board. When that happens, it is usually not the Board who suffers but rather the school.
About ten years ago I consulted with a Board that had taken its eye off of the financial performance of the school. By the time they had woken up to the extent of the problem (the school hadn't paid Revenue Canada its deductions at source for over two years and was millions in arrears) the school was in a mess. Needless to say, the Board held the Head accountable and summarily dismissed him. Eighteen months later the school, which had just recently celebrated its 90th anniversary, closed up for good. The damage to their fiscal position, and reputation proved to be insurmountable. Interestingly, by the time that school shut its doors, there was not a single member of the Board who had been there when the problems had arisen. They had all resigned and disappeared from public view.

So, if it is a given that the Head must be accountable for her or his actions to the Board, then to whom is the Board accountable when it messes up? It is important to remember that any Board governs on behalf of someone else, in trust. 
In the public sector, "trustees" act on behalf of the taxpayer. The parallel in independent schools would be to say that they act on behalf of the fee-paying parent. Consider how different their decisions would be, in either case, if they agreed that rather than governing in the interests of the taxpayer or the tuition payer, they agreed to act primarily in the best interest of the learners - regardless of cost. Independent schools have a number of different constituencies who have a stake in the health of the school;  students, parents, faculty and staff, alumni, and even suppliers and other service providers. All of these groups would suffer a loss if the school is not managed effectively and ethically.

In most jurisdictions, there is a wide range in the models of Board composition and accountability in place in independent schools. In two schools where I served as Head, the Board faced an Annual General Meeting each year filled with parents, alumni, faculty/staff and even students. The stakeholders were presented with an Annual Report, Financial Statements, and a slate of proposed Board Officers and Directors for the next year for their approval (or rejection!). In the third, the Board reported only to itself as voting members of the corporation. As a self-perpetuating Board they were accountable only to themselves and held the AGM behind closed doors. Although all three Boards were conscientious and responsible in their oversight of the school and its mission, the third was never held publicly accountable for its decisions or for the performance of the school. 
Regardless of the model, the key issues remain - how do stakeholders hold the Board to account to ensure that the school is delivering on its Mission? And how does any Board guarantee (even to itself) that it is a high performer?

The Globe and Mail Report on Business publishes annual governance rankings for the corporate sector. As part of this analysis, a major area of assessment is: stakeholder rights. They say that top functioning Boards are those that are accountable to their stakeholders. To ensure this they: face their stakeholders each year; have Directors that stand for election annually rather than serve staggered or open-ended terms; and publish all relevant performance information and audited financial statements. If all independent schools were to follow this benchmark for good governance it would mean that: Boards would face their stakeholders annually; Board membership would be for fixed terms (i.e. three years with one renewal); that candidacy for Board membership would be an open transparent process; Boards/schools would publish annual reports (programme, finance, etc.); and, that Boards would assess their own performance based upon clearly measurable performance metrics.

How does your school measure up to these benchmarks of accountability and good governance?




0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Dr. Jim Christopher
    has been working with Boards and Heads on Governance issues for the past 15 years. He is a former Superintendent of Schools, ED of the Canadian Association of Independent Schools and Canadian Educational Standards Institute and is the author of a number of books and articles of education and governance. His latest book, Beyond the Manual: A Realist's Guide to Independent School Governance is available on iTunes or at https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/388729

    View my profile on LinkedIn
    21stC Podcast

    Archives

    March 2022
    April 2020
    July 2019
    March 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    April 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly