Beyond the Manual: Governance and School Leadership
Contact Us
  • Home
  • The Governance Corner
  • Learning to Learn Differently
  • Support for Schools

The Governance Corner

A forum for discussing issues in Independent School governance in the third decade of the 21st Century

Read all Posts

The Trump Trap #12: Big Mouth, Small Ears

3/29/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
When you are on send all of the time, it is really difficult to listen to anyone else. Donald Trump is the poster-boy for leaders who are constantly communicating out, but rarely take the time to hear anyone else. Countless reports have commented upon his inattention to detail, his disinterest in understanding the complexities of an issue, and his focus on achieving closure and moving on. "The Art of the Deal" is a window on a strategy of communications in which there is no interest in having a meeting of the minds, but rather just engaging in old-fashioned horse trading where there are clear winners and losers.

We live in an era of “electronic town halls” which, as Neil Postman points out, bear little resemblance to their eighteenth century face to face counterparts. He calls them a “packaged, televised pseudo-event”. Information is disseminated through robo-calls or email “blasts”. Thoughtful, well-written letters to the editor, reflecting on the issues of the day have been replaced by vitriolic on-line “comments” which make pronouncements, or try to score political points, without any pretence of attempting to engage in a meaningful dialogue on a topic or news story. We share “personal” stories on Facebook – in a kind of “look at me, look at me” attempt to publicize the fleeting and often mundane happenings of our day to day lives, and many of us work hard to appear clever or profound throughout the day in 140 characters or fewer on Twitter. In a society of multi-taskers and short attention spans – the sound-bite is king! As a result, we have become a society of "posers". It is hardly surprising that the most common photos taken these days are selfies. After all, why record a scene or event without having ourselves front and centre? 

In many schools, Heads are equally walled off from really listening to their various stakeholders. Aside from Board meetings, most school leaders do not get much authentic feedback from anyone else. Staff meetings, and leadership team meetings are all too often echo chambers, in which challenging the Head on too many issues might get you persona non grata status around the table so, as a result, dissent gets either tuned out or suppressed. Parents, en masse, rarely get a chance to give collective voice to concerns either. Contact with administrators in general tends to be fleeting and superficial and large meetings are usually set up to disseminate information rather than to solicit new ideas and perceptions.

So, as a school leader, what can you do? Surveying is helpful. Anonymous "survey monkey" style surveys for parents, staff, and even students can glean you great insights into the general mood and perceptions of your various stakeholders. Focus groups, with an outside facilitator, can also gain you access to some voices that might otherwise go unheard. And, most importantly, managing by walking around. Taking time to talk and listen, and to demonstrate that you really value what is being said to you. Be careful not to take the "cocktail party" approach when you are having a conversation with parents, or staff where you are looking over their shoulders for someone more "interesting" to connect with. Little, personal things help to break down barriers and counter the cold, hard world of electronic communications.

​
We now really do live in McLuhan’s “global village”. It is our challenge to insure that it is not a village made up of individual, isolated e-huts but rather a place where we can still hold on to the human dimension of our personal relationships. A place where we all stop before we press the send button and ask ourselves – “would we say this to a real person’s face, or have we become a dehumanized society that takes shots at each other’s impersonal avatars and screen names”?

Technology can bring us together, or drive us apart. It’s up to us to choose. In the meantime work on being a human, not a bot!

Next post, what you can learn by listening...





0 Comments

The Trump Trap #11: Fake News: Spread at your own risk!

3/27/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
The term "fake news" has rapidly entered common language over the past year. Although construed by the supporters of Donald Trump to include any story that doesn't fit with their pre-determined narrative, it is just as often applied to the musings and mis-statements of the President himself. The more gentile term that is currently also being applied is the use of "alternative facts" (basically "facts" that provide an alternative set of possible explanations as opposed to the actual truth of a situation.) Recently, DJT has taken to defending his deliberate lying by claiming that he is quoting another news source. In other words, they may be lying, but he is telling the truth (about what they said!).

We may think that "fake news" is a relatively new phenomenon, but in actual fact, schools have been the purveyors of fake news for years! There are obvious examples that hit the press, such as the story from a few years ago where a former Superintendent of the Atlanta School District was arrested and charged with multiple counts of fraud. Her crime? She oversaw the systematic manipulation of student achievement results on high stakes standardized texts. At the time of her "crime" she had been lionized as a great educational leader who was achieving amazing things with respect to improving student performance. The truth was finally uncovered by a relentless local news outlet. Even so, it took years to uncover the breadth of the scandal. 
​
I dealt with a similar situation in Quebec a number of years ago. A local independent school had been performing below expectations on its Ministry examinations. The Board, as a goal, set a target of "significant improvement" on the exam results the next year and entrusted the administration to "get the job done". The next June the school boasted a 100% success rate and the average score jumped by 15%. The end had been reached, and the Head and his team had done their job! Or had they? Upon investigation, it turned out that the approach had been neither prudent or particularly ethical! To begin with, the school had hired a number of tutors to work with those students whom they had deemed to be "at-risk". The costs were significant and un-budgeted. Secondly, on the days of the exams, a number of borderline students were "excused" from writing and marked absent, while others were allowed to take their tutors into the exam room as "scribes" and, as it turned out, in most cases it was the tutors who had done so well on the exam, not the students! In this case, while the school, Board, and parents were happy with the results, the reputation of the school, and career of the Head did not survive the path it took to get there. 

When it comes to communications, schools are often the master of half-truths. Most school websites will boast something like: "98.9% of our students were accepted into the university of their choice". What they don't mention is the fact that, in a great many of those cases, a shockingly high percentage of those students either flunked out. or changed their major after the first year. Acceptance was equated with achievement, but was not really an indicator of academic success. It was, in essence, "fake news" about the quality of university preparation at these university prep schools.

Donald Trump is ham-handed. He tweets out "facts" that are easily debunked (inauguration crowd size, millions of illegal votes, Obama tapped my phones, etc.). Schools, and Heads, can sometime be too smart by half. They share news selectively, only publicizing things which put them in the best light. All too often, inexperienced Heads will use hyperbole and half-truths to cover up a questionable decision. Rather than take the short-term hit, they gamble that they won't get found out and that the issue will fade from memory.

It is a gamble not worth taking. It only takes getting caught once in a fake news exaggeration, to destroy your credibility, and sorely undercut the trust placed in you by parents. When sharing information, even that which comes to you from a credible source, it is always good to take a second look before you put your reputation and credibility on the line. A good rule of thumb is "if it seems too good to be true, it probably isn't!"

​Next time, how to listen before you speak...

0 Comments

The Trump Trap #10: Leader as Cyber Bully

3/26/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Let's face it, Donald Trump is the ultimate cyber bully. His constant goal in all of his electronic communications is to build himself up and tear others down. There is really no need to list the examples, because, by now, everyone has a mental list and, unfortunately, it's a list that keeps on growing. The key to understanding the President's explosions on Twitter is to recognize that his goal is to vent and, having done so, he is ready to move on with little or no thought to the consequences of his actions. 
Now don't get me wrong, I believe that everyone needs the chance to vent. The difficulty is that in our age of instant messaging, what might in the past have been a rant at the dinner table, followed by some reflection and perhaps tempered in conversation with friends and family members is, instead, often immediately shot through cyberspace at an unsuspecting target.

Heads can be as guilty of this as anyone else. It is an occupational hazard that the higher up you are in an organization, the more likely a target for complaint that you become. A very thick skin, and non-itchy trigger finger are essential pre-requisites for the job. As a corollary to this, the electronic musings or unfiltered comments made by Heads have a disproportionate impact, and shelf-life, due to the status of their position. In short, unlike Donald Trump, an effective Head absorbs caustic and often hurtful comments, reflects on their core messages and responds in a calm, open and conciliatory manner. This is not a win-lose power struggle, it is an exercise in issues management.

Effective communication is nuanced. It assumes a relationship, either personal or professional, and it depends on the opportunity for actual give and take. It is also most effective when it takes place in a calm and cordial atmosphere of sharing and collaborative problem-solving. At our school, that is still how the vast majority of parent-teacher conversations take place - a phone call, a pop in visit, or a formal interview - personal, face to face, human interaction. We are a small and intimate community and, in spite of the occasional glitch, it usually runs pretty smoothly.

Unfortunately, it would appear that that approach is rapidly becoming the exception, not the rule! In our age of instant messaging, someone's initial outrage over an issue has become the stuff of public record. Comments permanently posted on the web arrive there without context, and without the tone of voice, or note of exasperation, or raised eyebrow that would cause a personal audience to take it with a grain of salt and see it for what it was.

As adults, we should know better, and as parents and professional educators, we should do better. Every teacher, tutor, or administrator receives the occasional sarcastic (and sometimes nasty) email from a parent about some perceived injustice done to their daughter or son. In our instant age, we know how this happens. A person gets ginned up, bangs something out, and sends it. The content and the language are such that they would never use over the phone or in person. But in an email, tweet, or social media comment, they can make the most outlandish remarks without fear of interruption or contradiction. And, all too often, the receiving faculty member or administrator, offended and upset by what they feel to be an unwarranted attack, responds in kind. Each party's spin on things becomes a part of the permanent cyber record and no matter how many subsequent conversations or comments lower the temperature of the discussion, the original exchange remains, white hot, frozen in time and cyberspace.

Having all suffered (and often committed!) these abuses of electronic communication we should, and must, do better to prevent them from happening in the future. Because, once we press send, the damage has been done. The ripple effects of a rash email or tweet are unpredictable. Hopefully they will dissipate quickly like the aftermath of a brief summer shower - but perhaps, if we are lucky, the lesson learned will have much more permanence.

When, on an early Saturday morning, President Trump tweeted  "How low has President Obama gone to tap my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!” He was responding to a random news story speculating about how information might have been gathered on members of his transition team. Having vented, he went on to play golf while a firestorm ignited based upon his throw-away comments.

It is now three weeks later, and the White House, Congress, and the intelligence community are still reverberating with the impact of this random and impulsive communication. It should be a lesson to us all as to when to press send, and when to just press delete.

Next post will look at how to get off "send" and get on "receive".
​

0 Comments

The Trump Trap #9: The Bully Pulpit: Use at your own risk

3/25/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
When Theodore Roosevelt described the Presidency as a "bully pulpit", he meant "bully" in the 19th century British sense of superb or wonderful as in the phrase: "Bully for you!". To take his meaning, he believed that the status of the Presidency, its authoritative voice, and the range of its audience could have a powerful impact on getting ideas across. In the second decade of the 21st century however, the term has taken on an unexpected double entendre. The 45th President uses his pulpit not to praise (except himself) but rather to "bully" others in the modern sense of the word. There have been two news stories this week that have emphasized that point - the first involves NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick who protested against Trump during the season. In a campaign-style rally in Kentucky, the President bragged that no teams would hire the free agent because they were afraid of what he (Trump) would say about them on Twitter. The threat of his bully pulpit, he claimed, was going to keep that person out of a job. The second example was the wide range of news stories that reported that as he was trying to cobble together a majority coalition for the AHCA, rather that trying to negotiate some of the complex terms, (which he admittedly didn't understand), President Trump instead threatened Republican members of Congress that he would ensure that anyone who voted "no" would lose their seat in the 2018 mid-term elections. When his bullying didn't pay off, he then vowed revenge, and intended to make a list of everyone who voted no in the planned vote. As we now know, cooler heads around him prevailed, and the bill was simply withdrawn without a vote. So the next day the President instead used his favourite bully pulpit vehicle - Twitter - to blame the whole thing on the Democrats!

Heads are in the position of being able to use their (albeit smaller) Bully Pulpit in both ways as well. The strong capable leader will use the "megaphone" of their position to push for positive change, to support new initiatives and to build momentum for innovation and school-improvement. Their weaker colleagues however, have been known to use the "power" of their position to silence opposition, marginalize potential rivals, and create an echo chamber around themselves where everyone treads softly, and takes their lead from the Head before committing themselves on an issue. The first Head welcomes debate and builds a community of purpose; while the second, stifles any voices but her or his own, and creates groups that are either "in" or "out" within the faculty and staff.

Many years ago, the then Head of a CAIS school in Montreal got into just such a power struggle with his faculty. He brooked no dissent and, when the faculty challenged him on a particularly thorny issue, within a couple of days had posted every one of their jobs in the local newspaper. His intent was to demonstrate his power and silence them. However, it didn't really turn out as he had planned. The faculty quickly unionized and took its grievances to the Board - as a result, a new job ad was put in the paper - "Head of School"!

A "bully pulpit", properly used, is a gift to the leader of an institution. You are not just a voice in the crowd, you are the Princips - first among equals - and your voice carries as much or more weight than all of the others put together. Misuse it however, and it loses its status and power. Just watch people's eyebrows when you speak, and you will know what side of the equation you are on!

Yesterday's events required a small detour from the intended focus of today's post - how to build an effective communications strategy - but how could I resist!? Back on track tomorrow...





0 Comments

The Trump Trap #8: Communications: It's not about you!

3/23/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Where would the Twitterverse be without an almost daily dose of Trumpian Tweets?! His on-going flow of self-promoting and, all too often, bizarre 140 character pronouncements invariably make headlines. Maybe not the sort of publicity that most of us would want, but you do have to say one thing for all of his tweeting, every one of them certainly  gets noticed. And, if you believe the old truism - any publicity is good publicity - well... maybe that saying has finally met its match. Having said that, there is no question but that Donald Trump's outrageous public comments online, in debates, and clearly at his rallies, helped propel him to the Presidency. So, where is the lesson here?

To begin with, no Head should assume that her or his career could survive a video of bragging about sexual assault. Secondly, blatantly racist or sexist remarks, derogatory imitations of a person with disabilities, or banning entry to the your school on the basis of religion would hardly read well on your resume either.  And yet, the person in the most powerful job in the United States has parleyed all of these things into a four year contract including a house!

Okay, lets agree that the content of the President's personal communications are not worth emulating. Is there anything instructive about his use of media? After all, he played the news networks like Nero's fiddle, having them dancing to his tune while the electoral process burned. The reality is that Trump's greatest secret is that it is always about him and what he thinks. He never answers questions or responds to controversies, he just tweets about something else and moves on. Even when confronted this week by Time magazine about his claim that Ted Cruz and his father had breakfast with JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, he answered "I didn't make that up, I read it in the newspaper!" (The National Enquirer to be exact, right next to the story of an extraterrestrial takeover of pizza chains around the world!)

So first lesson: it is not about you! Heads often fall into the trap of thinking that they are communicating by publishing updates about themselves. They send out school-wide "letters", email bursts, weekly blogs and pronouncements at school assemblies or staff meetings. Many Heads that I know are constantly pushing out feel-good news stories on Twitter, or recording school events on Facebook and Instagram. If your goal is to affirm that you were at something - get someone else to tweet about you. If you still want to tweet, do it once for each event - not updates every ten minutes and, instead, encourage other staff members to give their own take and retweet it. In other words, show that there is a school community and that you are part of it, and not necessarily the most important part (hint: the most important part is the kids!).

A key aspect of this is how you present new initiatives. Donald Trump may brag about creating the "best health care plan ever!" but everyone knows that he had nothing to do with it. It may surprise you, but most people know the same thing about the new initiatives that are going on at your school. Your job is to create the climate and provide the supports to make things happen, but usually the real work is done by someone else. Give them the credit: to your parents; to their colleagues; and, especially to the Board. My Head's reports have always profiled the faculty, staff, and members of the admin team who are doing great things for the school - their names are highlighted, and their initiatives praised. I don't take credit for their ideas and accomplishments - I bask in reflected glory as the one who was smart enough to recognize their talent and foster it.

There is nothing worse that watching a Head pat her or himself on the back for the amazing work of others. As Donald Trump would say - SAD!

In the next post we will talk about what and how you should communicate with your constituencies.

0 Comments

The Trump Trap #7: How to make sure that the "new" is actually better!

3/21/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture

It is late Wednesday night on the eve of the day that "Trumpcare" is scheduled to come to a vote in the House of Representatives. News coverage has focused on the arm-twisting and (not so) veiled threats of Representatives being "cut loose" in 2020 if they don't toe the line. In the middle of all of this, is Donald Trump. Although he is pushing for a compromise deal, his aids have made it clear that he doesn't really understand, or care about the details. As far as he is concerned, as long as something "new" is passed to replace the ACA, then he has done his job. He leaves the pesky details (cost, logistics, how many people will lose coverage, etc.) to the grassroots in Congress to work out.

Heads sometimes make this same mistake. They get on board and highly promote a new initiative being pushed forward by a staff member without taking enough care to look at how the plan would roll out, what it would actually cost, and its impact on other programmes and services. When the change process is driven by a slavish commitment to the new and trendy, schools can often end up resembling a graveyard of highly touted, but ineffectively implemented, shiny new programmes. It is the Head's job to prevent this from happening, to articulate and defend the school's vision of the future, and to ensure that every change takes the school community deliberately down a collectively supported path.

Most schools are characterized by lighthouses of innovation. One teacher emerges with a new and innovative approach to teaching and learning and her or his ideas ripple out from their classroom, slowly dissipating and losing energy the farther down the hall they travel. These lighthouse programmes are great for marketing, but they don't represent disciplined change. Typically, this level of change is not transferable or sustainable and only lasts as long as the teacher driving it is at the school. In actual fact, in this way schools are quite different from business and industry. You see, we don't expect change to come from the bottom, no matter how we admire individually innovative teachers, change in schools is not a "grassroots" movement. We need to have it "imposed" from the top. Over the years, I have led reviews of most of the major independent schools in Canada. The ones that really sparkled, not from a few shiny baubles of programmes and facilities, but from the existence of a dynamic culture of teaching and learning, were a reflection of a driving vision from the leadership of the school. While reflecting on this process, I happened to read an exchange between authors Bill Eggers and Chip Heath about the topic of organizational change as part of a discussion moderated by Deloitte Research. Now they were talking primarily about government, but I think that we can see the implications for schools. They described the change process as a contest between the rational and the emotional. The rational mind sees the need for change but the emotional side is fearful and wants to keep things as they are. They compared this contest as the equivalent of a human (rational) riding on the back of the emotional (elephant). It wasn't impossible to change the 
pachyderm's direction, but it wasn't easy either. School culture is a bit like an elephant. Teachers, parents, and often even students are generally resistant to change. School leaders have a choice, they can let the elephant wander where it wants or they can try to direct its course. 

Leadership in high performing organizations did not improve or innovate in a vacuum. The first step for a Head is to inspire the members of the school community to something beyond what they currently think is possible. The key is having a dream that everyone can embrace and aspire to. After that, change becomes inevitable. This dream, or vision, or whatever you want to call it, is the critical first step to getting the elephant on the same path as you. No matter how much you plan, or cleverly present, or articulate the changes you want to make, unless your school shares the dream with you, the road ahead will be difficult and often lonely.

Exciting change starts with an inspirational dream. As Andy Hargreaves once quipped: "Martin Luther King didn't stand up on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and say to the crowd - 'I have a Strategic Plan'!"

Currently, in Washington, we see a government without a cohesive dream or vision of the future. It is obsessed with retail politics - looking at targeted changes that will appeal to a certain group of electors at the ballot box - but lacking in a coherent path to move the country forward. Schools often do the same, implementing narrowly focused programmes in one division and something completely different somewhere else. There is a short-term impression of innovation and action, but ultimately the pieces don't fit together and the whole thing falls apart.

School Heads can avoid this trap. You need to build a culture for change first, then begin to move slowly forward. Share the dream, plan together, innovate. Don't get too far ahead of your school - that is the discipline of change. Remember - "new" is not always "better"!

Next post we will  begin to consider the greatest "Trump Trap" of all. The danger of undisciplined communications.

0 Comments

Trump Trap #6: "Out with the Old, In with the New" is not a plan

3/21/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
The easiest place to ride, is on the bandwagon. "Repeal and Replace!", "Build that Wall!", "Lock her up!" (I even drove by a group of seniors protesting in Palm Desert, California last evening waving signs with a new mantra: "Deport Trump to Russia!") Everyone loves a catchy, simple slogan or a new and shiny initiative. Since 2009, the GOP has been absolutely certain that they wanted to tear down the ACA (Obamacare) and replace it with something else. That they knew what they wanted to do - repeal - has always been clear. Why they wanted to do it - replace - has been a little more murky. And this week, the rubber hit the road, "what" got confronted by "why" and it turned out that the gap within the GOP was greater than the one between most moderate Republicans with their Democrat opponents. They had spent eight years agreeing on the what, without ever having a meeting of the minds on the why. To quote the President - "It's a disaster!"

Political campaigns, like Head entry plans, are much more easily conceived if they are about being against something. Donald Trump has defined himself, both during his campaign, and in office, as being against many things. He opposes free trade - so death to NAFTA and the TPP; he is against Muslim immigration and accepting refugees - so let's have a Muslim ban; he is a climate change denier - so let's de-regulate industry and ditch environmental protections. You see, it is much easier to condemn the work of your predecessor than to come up with concrete, positive ideas of your own. Tear down first, and figure out how to rebuild later. 

I have seen many school heads begin their tenures the same way. It is usually quite easy to cherry pick and condemn some of the actions (and personnel favourites) of your predecessor. The challenge is to put those negatives into a positive narrative rather than just a slash and burn, negative rant. 

You see, the real issue with change is not about what we want to do, but why we want to do it. Schools face this challenge all of the time. Every article that you read, speaker that you hear, or TED Talk that you watch tells you what you should be doing. They all tell you that education is changing and that you better hurry up and change with it. And, there is no-one more vulnerable to this call to arms  than a new Head. She or he has usually  been hired as a change agent, and as the new school year gets underway, they put incredible pressure on themselves to do something big, and to do it quickly! Often, if they have done a bit of homework, they have already set themselves up, by mistake, in their interview. The school wants to improve innovation - The have declared: "We need to build a Makerspace! The Board is concerned about academics - Their solution: "Let's go IB or AP!" The school is losing money - Easy! "We have to cut staff and raise fees!" Kids' shirts are untucked - Got it covered: "We are going to crack down on uniforms!" You see it is always easy to come up with sweeping (and often facile) solutions to complex problems. It is, however, far more difficult to deliver on those promises in a thoughtful and effective way.

Donald Trump is stumping this week to replace Obamacare. In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, his plurality of victory was 44,000 votes. The AHCA alternative to Obamacare that he is flogging will take insurance away from 670,000 Pennsylvanians. Do you think that he has thought this out? Guess what? The fall-out of tearing down the status-quo, and giving the loudest voices what they want, is often that you cause collateral damage that you never imagined.   

In fact the best change agents are not the ones who out-race the bandwagon, instead, they are the ones who put the brakes on - not to stop change, but to engage it and to innovate in a disciplined way. And that, is where effective leadership comes in.

​Next post we will look at how that can actually happen in a school.





0 Comments

The Trump Trap #5 - The New Broom Syndrome

3/21/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
A distinguishing feature of American government is the large number of political appointees who fill key roles in every government department. While this level of patronage would make most Canadians appalled, it is taken as a matter of course in the United States. The result is that, when a new President is elected, there is a massive turnover in many of the key positions in the upper level of the public service with the resulting hiccup in the continuity and smooth delivery of programmes and services. This has been particularly exacerbated this year by the huge number of vacancies that have yet to be filled. The other challenge that this approach to governing creates is the fact that key personnel all serve "at the pleasure of the President". When you are totally beholden to a leader who wants reinforcement of her or his opinions and a constant bolstering of their own ego - it is difficult to give strong, independent advice or to speak "truth to power".

Schools should operate differently. Most new Heads arrive to find a leadership group (admin team, Head's council, etc.) in place and managing the day to day operations of the school. They represent her or his key support group and source of information. They will also be nervous and uncertain as to how their roles might change under a new Head. The most important task of an incoming leader is to get this group on-side as quickly as possible. While some inexperienced Heads believe that they should automatically have their respect and unwavering loyalty by virtue of their position, most veteran school leaders understand that respect and loyalty are earned, not demanded.

The first few months are critically important in nurturing this relationship. Both sides should be going out of their way to demonstrate their mutual respect, and support for one another. If there are weaknesses or gaps on the team, the incoming Head can move to strengthen their expertise either through directed PD, or the strategic addition of one or two new team members with those missing key pieces. Whatever she or he does, it is critically important to maintain that cabinet solidarity for at least the first year. It takes at least that long to determine which members have the depth of expertise that the school needs, and which are big talkers who produce little of value to the organization.

The key to all of this is to think of the school as a whole. The leadership team should not be perceived (in your mind or theirs) to be serving at the "pleasure of the Head". Quite the opposite, they should be encouraged to challenge and question; to propose new ideas and initiatives; to warn you when you are stepping into a well-known minefield; and, to have enough independent credibility with the faculty and staff in order to be able to support you publicly when you screw up (which you will!). It is a truism of leadership that while "B" calibre leaders surround themselves with a "C" level team who look to her or him as their inspirational leader and guide; "A" level leaders surround themselves with an "A+" team who make them look good, and do great things for the school. While a weak or inexperienced team is only as good as the Head who leads them, a strong team carries the Head along for the ride. Only with a strong, experienced team in place and functioning effectively, can a new Head actually make significant, and lasting, positive change for the school.

Heads who reject experience in favour of subservience or, as Donald Trump has done in the past, pick style over substance, do so at their peril. The school suffers, and if it is being run like a "one-man" show, you know who will be the first to go!

As the President Trump and the U.S. House of Representatives struggle this week to cobble together a plan for the passage of the AHCA, in the next post we will begin take a look at how an incoming Head can manage change without sacrificing her or his principles.
​

0 Comments

The Trump Trap #4: Living in an Echo Chamber - Part 2

3/20/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Almost 20 years ago, as I transitioned from Head of an independent school for students with learning challenges to take on the role of Executive Director of CESI (the national accrediting body for Canadian independent  schools), I was faced with a conundrum. My successor,  an inexperienced but hard-working and dedicated administrator, had become convinced by back channel contacts during the transition period that the biggest challenge facing the school was a need for tougher discipline. My approach of student-centred, restorative justice was perceived by a few hard-liners to be too "soft" and they wanted a full-scale crackdown. In my final meeting with the in-coming Head, and the Board - a farewell luncheon to wish me well - he held court on how he was going to crack down and "make the school great again". (So much for my legacy!). Without fully understanding the school and its student population, he hit the ground running in September; changed the discipline policy; implemented extreme vetting of uniform infractions; and forbid senior high school students from leaving campus at lunch. By Christmas he had lost one-third of the student body and a number of key Board members. By March he asked to meet with me and confessed, over a couple of late night beers, that he had blown through the substantial operating reserve that I had left for him, and was facing significant losses for the current school year. He was finally ready to accept the help that I had offered, but it was a year too late. After struggling for a few more years, and running up debts into the millions, he finally was let go. The school lurched on for a year and a half more and then, after almost 90 years in operation, it closed.

Now, this is a bit of an apocryphal story, but it illustrates the danger of not doing your own on-site homework when entering a new situation. Perhaps the most telling declaration coming out of the Trump White House over the past month was the President's comments on healthcare after meeting with a group of insurance executives. After making years of pronouncements about quickly repealing and replacing Obamacare, he emerged from his meeting to declare: "Who knew that healthcare was so complicated?" Well, of course, everyone - except his inner circle - did know!

New Heads walk the same tightrope. They are buffeted by competing interests, all of whom want to have their own personal agendas adopted as school policy. Every school that I have entered, either as incoming Head, or as an accreditor, is rife with opinions about what is working well; what programmes or policies need to be replaced; and, who is not doing their jobs. The true challenge for any incoming leader is to take in all of this disparate information, mentally file it, and then take on the slow, and meticulous process of learning for themselves on the job. While you might think that a new Head has to establish her or himself by immediately taking dramatic action, the reality is most people would rather that you didn't.

A change in leadership is a time of angst and tumult. The best thing that a new Head coming in can do is to calm things down, assuage fears, and show themselves to be open to getting to know the culture and the people before moving forward. There are always a few "low hanging fruit" that you can deal with, administrative irritants whose removal will have everyone on-side, but any major changes should wait. 

Conventional wisdom would tell you that you should probably wait six months before implementing any major changes - i would suggest, for schools, that the fall term is probably long enough. Begin floating ideas by Christmas, set up some new initiatives in January (when people are feeling fresh and relaxed after a holiday break), and begin the really heavy lifting after Spring Break. This will allow you time to gain the confidence of your faculty, staff and parents; to get to know the currents of school life (and the shoals you want to avoid); and, to field test a few ideas to see the reaction.

You will complete your first year with momentum and have plans in place to hit the road running in September. The alternative is to follow the lead of the Trump White House - take quick action only to have it slapped down; think that you are implementing change when, in reality you are sowing chaos; and be more focused on telling people what is wrong with the school, and with what your predecessor did, rather than focusing on how to make a good school even better.

Your tenure, hopefully, isn't a one year project. The real secret of success is to look at your long game and plan for it. Next post we will talk about how you build an effective team to move forward with your agenda.



0 Comments

The Trump Trap #3: Living in an Echo Chamber - Part 1

3/19/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Walking in the door on that first day, most Heads inherit an institution and a leadership group that is, for the most part, running pretty well. ​The school and its leaders may be coasting, and lacking a driving vision, but you can generally be sure that they are all working hard to do the best that they can for kids.

Donald Trump entered the White House with a similar situation. The economy was in good shape, the country was at peace with limited military involvement against ISIS, there was generalized national health care for the first time in history, and concrete action being taken on climate change. In short, there was a strong foundation upon which to build. And, although the new President might want to take things in a different direction, there was no imminent crisis or need to act quickly. That is not to say that things were perfect - but he had four years ahead of him to steer the country in a different direction. In fact, it was a perfect time to sit back, reflect and begin a process of systematic change and growth. 

However, Trump came in with a self-defining mantra. He had told voters that things were a "mess" and only he could fix them; he described different government policies as "terrible" and military strategy as "pathetic" and he had promised sweeping changes from "Day 1". At the same time, he nursed a highly suspicious, almost paranoid, view of the honesty and professionalism of anyone who had been appointed by the previous administration. So his "job 1" was to both conduct a purge, and to surround himself with his own team who were loyal only to him.

It has been observed, that in business, the President had consistently not promoted the most experienced candidates, or the best and the brightest, but rather had always chosen people with flash. He preferred style over substance - a predilection that had led him to bankruptcy and business ruin on many occasions. A quick look at his inner circle shows a similar pattern in the White House, and what should be a sounding board for testing and challenging ideas, has become an echo chamber where whatever Trump says is repeated and amplified.

Over the years, I have seen new Heads make exactly the same mistake. Rather than coming in, getting the lay of the land, and taking advantage of the experienced team in place, they demonstrate an almost manic need to change as much as possible, as soon as they can. Like Trump, they feel that their hiring gives them a "mandate" for change and that the Board and school community will want to see them take action as quickly as possible. Usually this is a recipe for disaster! In the next post, we will look at how the first hundred days can be the making or breaking of a headship.

0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    Dr. Jim Christopher
    has been working with Boards and Heads on Governance issues for the past 15 years. He is a former Superintendent of Schools, ED of the Canadian Association of Independent Schools and Canadian Educational Standards Institute and is the author of a number of books and articles of education and governance. His latest book, Beyond the Manual: A Realist's Guide to Independent School Governance is available on iTunes or at https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/388729

    View my profile on LinkedIn
    21stC Podcast

    Archives

    March 2022
    April 2020
    July 2019
    March 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    April 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly